« July 2007 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Skwigg Blog
Tuesday, 3 July 2007
Marathoners Gaining Fat?
I just heard from someone (actually about the 357th someone) who is struggling with weight gain while training for a marathon. She's running about 7 hours a week and gaining lovely new butt and thigh cellulite - right on top of her formerly gorgeous quads! With the visible increase in fat and her "benchmark" skinny jeans not fitting anymore, she is confident that her weight gain is actual fat and not water and glycogen in the muscles. That is corroborated by her very low (for a runner) carb intake of about 35%.

She's an experienced marathoner, but I hear from a lot of strength training gym rats who decide to do their first marathon thinking they're going to burn lots of calories and lose fat at an insane rate when they add all that cardio. And then they have the rude awakening. They end up fatter, with less lean mass and less definition. It's such a common occurrence that "how to avoid weight gain during marathon training" seems to be a hot topic on runner's forums. 

At first I thought everybody must be going overboard with the calories and carbs, or maybe just packing a lot of glycogen into their muscles. But I've talked to many low-carbing semi-starving marathoners who experienced the same thing. It doesn't seem to make a difference whether they undereat or overeat, whether they gain scale weight or lose it, or whether they still strength train, their percentage of body fat generally goes up. Why is that, you ask? Well, hell if I know. So I asked Alwyn Cosgrove. He says:

I think the adaptation to the activity (ie the metabolism slows down) occurs at an extremely fast rate. So
1) they lower metabolism quicker than they burn calories
2) the activity does nothing to maintain lean mass - in all actuality - it likely reduces lean mass (and lowers metabolism further)
3) The adaptation to running - means that they don't burn as many calories doing it as they originally did.

My other more esoteric idea is the homeostasis one.
When you weight train - you break down muscle -- and the body adapts by growing more muscle.
When you undereat - your body adapts by lowering metabolism in the short term.
When you overeat - your body speeds up metabolism for a short time
When you drink too much water - you pee more - when you don't drink enough - you retain.
The body adapts to any stimulus by doing the reverse.

So when you do an aerobic activity (that burns fat) maybe your body adapts by storing fat?

AC

Wow! Crazy thought! Does that mean if you do anaerobic activities like weight training and HIIT that burn a lot of carbohydrate, your body adapts by storing carbohydrate more efficiently and burning... more fat???

But back to the marathoners, it makes sense that your body would adapt to doing the same activity all the time, and that maybe the calories you burn can't keep pace with the damage to your metabolism and lean mass. Alwyn also mentioned a study where people who added 6 hours of aerobic activity a week for a year, lost an average of (drum roll) only 3 pounds (Exercise Effect on Weight and Body Fat in Men and Women. Mctiernan et al. Obesity. June 2007. 15: 1496-1512). Which is why sometimes I want to swat the newbie BFLers who right away want to add tons of moderate cardio to the program. If they'd just follow instructions and throw up a lung for 20 minutes, they'd get even better results. The idea is to get way out of your comfort zone and do something you're really not used to. With Afterburn, for example, not only are you doing the lung-chucking interval training, but he has you do a different cardio activity each workout. He doesn't want you doing the same activity even two sessions in a row, because if you can't adapt, your metabolism doesn't downshift. Combine the variety of intense interval sessions with challenging total body strength workouts and Alwyn's approach for maximum fat loss is the exact opposite of what most marathoners do, which is going easy on the strength training and spending hours per week doing the same moderate aerobic activity.

This whole subject fascinates me. It sounds insane that marathoners would ever struggle to stay lean, and yet I hear from freaked out distance runners all the time. Anybody have any additional insight or experience on this one? Julie? Julie? Anybody? Anybody?

On an unrelated but funny note, I was watching The Simpsons tonight and caught this hilarious exchange between Marge and Homer.

Marge: Oh Homer, you're not fat -- just big boned.
Homer: Marge, nobody gains 30 pounds of bones.

Posted by skwigg at 9:51 PM CDT

Tuesday, 3 July 2007 - 10:24 PM CDT

Name: "Michelle"

We have scads of marathoners around our area who come to my hot yoga classes to heal from the insane destruction of their joints..but none have complained of weight gain! They look like scarecrows in fact, by marathon day.I believe that most experienced marathoners don't lose much weight, but runners are usually not overweight - consistent ones that I've met....Alwyn's theory of adaptation would wash if people were running marathons consistently, but most people who are obsessive don't usually do more than a few a year....I dunno....that surprises me, none of the ones I work with,especially leading up to and just past the race, have ANY fat on them at all!(nor periods, nor joint flexibility, nor a pain free sleep!)Since marathoners are such exremists, I question if the weight gainers are binge eaters in private...THAT I would believe....

Wednesday, 4 July 2007 - 4:42 AM CDT

Name: "Jenni"

I can't give you a reason why...but I started marathon training at 18% b/f and now I'm 19.8% and 10lbs heavier

Wednesday, 4 July 2007 - 7:05 AM CDT

Name: "Kelly"

Hey Skwigg,

 I have recently had a very similar experience.   I have been training for my first Triathlon for the last 6 months (the event is on July 15).  After about 3 months I noticed that my ass was getting huge.  I could not wrap my head around the idea that all my training was making me fat.  You get this image in your head about these elite althetes with shredded bodies and when you realize you are not attaining the same results, you get a little upset. I didn't decide to do the race for that reason, although it would have been a nice bonus.  I actually decided to the race to honor my daughter's father who died tragically in a car accident on July 15th of last year.  I decided to do something in his memory and have raised $1600.00 to be donated to a children's hospital in his name.  The fact that I am doing the race in his honor was the only reason I did not quit when I realized all my time spent on a bike, in the pool or out running was making me gain instead of lose.   So, once I realized what was happening I scaled back my training and got back into the weight room and have successfully gotten rid of the extra booty.   I was so glad to see this addresses on your web site, I thought I was doing something wrong with my training, but now I see it wasn't.   Thank you for putting my mind at ease.  Phew.

Kelly in Canada

Wednesday, 4 July 2007 - 1:13 PM CDT

Name: "Eve"

Hi Renee,


Speaking of Afterburn, how long did it take for you to get the book?A

Wednesday, 4 July 2007 - 6:55 PM CDT

Name: "Flo"
Home Page: http://flosplaceonline.com

This is something I'm battling with.  I've been trying to lose weight for a while now and began Afterburn back in January.  I've done 2 marathons in the past and both times I've put weight on during the training. I want to do the marathon this year and am trying to find a program to balance the Afterburn (actually I'm starting Turbulence Training) and the running. The HIIT intervals add an amazing amount to my running, speed and endurance, so I definetly want to keep that going.  If you find the answer please be sure to post it :)

Wednesday, 4 July 2007 - 7:13 PM CDT

Name: skwigg

I think it took about a week to get my copy of Afterburn.

Thursday, 5 July 2007 - 7:10 AM CDT

Name: "Cindy"

If I may, I'd like to jump in here with a little info I picked up along the way...however it was a couple years ago when I read this so I'm surely about to leave a lot of it out.  Although I really don't want to dispute all of the scientific data you've just presented...I read that a lot of runners spend a huge amount of their time being sedentary because their workout has basically kicked their ass.  They are sore, stiff and well...just plain spent.  There is little cross training going on to help aleviate this.  This is not the case with the more elite professional athletes mind you...this is the average housewife who has decided to take on a personal challenge ...or something to that effect if you know what I mean.  Now another thing...just because someone is training for a marathon does NOT mean they are running a marathon every day.  I did some training myself.  Most running plans are actually very small amounts.  Some beginner programs will have you running less than 8 miles a day most days of the week.  Okay...we know the body adapts to slow steady state exercise.  how many calories did that workout really burn?  We are not talking about sprinting here.  We are talking about the average marathon trainer who is probably doing more than a 9 minute mile for their entire workout.  Thats not burning off huge calories.  It is making the joints sore and stiff and leaving the individual to want to take the path of least resistance for the rest of the day.  Been there, done that.  I find that when I primarily use running as my workout I tend to feel like I've earned my rest.  Tend to sit at the computer more.  Tend to put off my mall trip...which would have meant hours of walking around.   It can be a lot easier to grab the spoon and dig into the ice cream when you feel like you just kicked your ass working out...which running makes you feel...but I will tell ya...45 minutes of marathon training is NOT equal to 45 minutes of the hell you face on the step mill.  The difference is how you don't feel the strain and impact on the joints as much and therefor after a little break I am able to go about the day and continute to burn a few more calories being active.  Just a thought I wanted to mention because it was overlooked in the data.  But the did measure the caloric expenditure in case studies and found that newbies to exercise...(running less than 2 years) were classic cases of not realizing they were actually taking in additional calories and not burning off as many as they thought. 

Thursday, 5 July 2007 - 7:51 AM CDT

Name: skwigg

That makes perfect sense actually. So, not only are you rapidly adapting to the chosen workout (in terms of fat burning), the chosen workout may leave you flattened for the rest of the day, prompting you to further conserve energy. And yet, you're so wiped out, certainly you must have trained hard enough to have earned bigger portions or a little splurge. That's an interesting addition to the conversation. Keep em coming!

Thursday, 5 July 2007 - 11:53 AM CDT

Name: "Laura"

This seems to happen to women mostly - my hubby does duathlons and is quite thin - the long distances bike rides dont seem to make him gain wieght at all.  He also does lots of intervals - both on the bike and while running...maybe that helps???

Thursday, 5 July 2007 - 12:32 PM CDT

Name: "Vonnie"

I ran a marathon 2 years ago. I wore a size 4 and weighed 134. I was eating a moderate amount of starchy carbs for all that training. I am now not training for a marathon, get my carbs from fruits and fibrous vegetables, I weigh 125 and wear a size 2. I was definitely "thicker" when training for that blasted thing. But I'm still glad that I accomplished it. That being said, I prefer a half marathon. I didn't experience any weight gain and really didn't need to change my diet at all except for 2 days prior I increased my starch a bit.

Thursday, 5 July 2007 - 1:05 PM CDT

Name: skwigg

It does seem like most of the runners who gain scale weight are women. Men tend to lose, but a lot of what they lose seems to be lean mass. So the guys will write to me all freaked out about their percentage of body fat going up even though the scale is going down. Even if you're losing weight, it seems to have a  negative impact on body comp. Probably more so for guys who go from spending most of their time in the weight room to spending most of their time hitting the pavement.

Thursday, 5 July 2007 - 6:54 PM CDT

Name: "Julie"
Home Page: http://www.julieberg.blogspot.com

Here I am! Here I am! Oh yeah, I know this phenomena all to well. Plain and simple: my body adapts. Just as people's eyes glass over and I get that deer in the headlights look when I tell someone that I raced 100 miles, because they asked why my feet look like hell, I explain that THE BODY ADAPTS.  So does it adapt to running 100 miles per week and eating 1500 calories a day. The body is a very smart body. I first began running to lose weight. I lost 30 pounds very quickly and then stagnated. I cut my calories down to 1000 a day and cut my carbs. I lost some more fat, but not as quickly as I wanted. Fast forward to present; I am 135 pounds, 16.5% body fat, I run 100 miles a week, can run 100 mile races, I lift 3 times a week, I bike, I am strong. I am no longer dieting. This is now my lifestyle. I eat 1500-2000 calories a day, roughly 35/35/ 30 macros and maintain. Isn't that something? I maintain at this high level of exercise and lower calorie/carb range. My body has adapted. I no longer looks at that as a bad thing It just is. As soon as I begin to eat higher carbs or to eat sugar..whoa nellie, the scale moves up and I gain fat. I do tend to gain a few pounds in the winter, but I'm ok with that too, it comes back off in the summer. I enjoyed reading the email from AC. Thanks!

Friday, 6 July 2007 - 5:49 AM CDT

Name: "Glynis"
Home Page: http://360.yahoo.com/imoutrunning

It happened to me and I know exactly why, a simple blood test proved it. 

The stress of marathon training resulted in an exacerbation of an autoimmune condition, Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.  Extreme stress or hormonal change can trigger the nasty antibodies to start attacking your own body.  Mine attacked my thyroid.  I started out training for the marathon at a loose size 6 and ended up a tight 10 when it was over.  A blood test showed that my TSH had gone from normal levels to soundly hypothyroid levels.  The thyroid is the "master" control of the metabolism and mine was shutting down from stress overload.

It has taken THREE years to get my meds regulated and get back to that size 6, but I'm finally there!

Friday, 6 July 2007 - 7:30 AM CDT

Name: "Stephanie Workman"
Home Page: http://www.tnchampweekend.com or http://www.torchspirit

Swigg,

Sorry I've no idea what your real name is :) I am a faithful reader of your blog.you crack me up! You give wonderful advice also and I've enjoyed following your progress.

 Anyway, who the heck am I? My name is Stephanie Workman and I manage 2 BFL websites..Tennessee BFL and Torchspirit. Every year I host an annual BFL conference weekend in Knoxville TN. The details of this event can be found at http://www.tnchampweekend.com.

 We'd love for you to come to this event when/if you're able! I know many folks would love to meet you!

Here are the other websites I manage:

 http://groups.msn.com/tennesseebodyforlife

http://www.torchspirit.com/

Feel free to drop me a line. I'd love to hear from you.

Stephanie

Friday, 6 July 2007 - 12:24 PM CDT

Name: "Andrea"
Home Page: http://tenacity.net

I'm one of those marathoner types.  The leanest I ever was came about from running about 5 hours a week on top of a BFL challenge, and I'm betting the leanness was 'despite' the running...  So yeah, I'm looking longingly at those 'skinny jeans' as I count down the last month until my marathon. 
 
Afterburn, et al, are about burning more fat overall and while NOT working out, while low HR cardio is about burning mostly fat while sparing glycogen while doing very long endurance exercise - so it's useful for marathons or ultras - if you've taught your body to take in little to no carbs yet still keep going at 70% HR for 3-12 hours at a time, that's the goal.
So.... the question I'm starting to have is, "what's so bad about burning carbs WHILE working out?".  Essentially, I'm questioning the rationale of the "goal" stated above - whether or not its even a worthy target. 
 
I like the general advice that most modern/rational/zone-ish trainers will give which is to eat their recommended, sensible, low-carb diet during your 'regular' life, but then while working out and/or immediately thereafter you get to eat your starchy carbs.  I don't want to rock my training boat quite yet, but the second my race is over I'm back on the 3x weekly heavy lifting bandwagon, in addition to the running.

Saturday, 7 July 2007 - 2:35 AM CDT

Name: "RD"

Is there something about the nature of running (I've heard it's really catabolic)? Do you hear the same complaint from cyclists,x-country skiers, or jazzercise bunnies?

To what extent does a daily jog become NEAT?  You walk your dogs every day and you don't worry about adapting to it. If dog walking or jogging were your only exercise would you be better off not doing it?

I've never seen a fat Kenyan =)

 Jon Benson sent around a newsletter several months ago about LISS training with a heart rate monitor and how you should try to increase your speed while not going over a fairly low heart rate and how it would turn you into a fat-burning machine... I guess it makes sense if you do Ironmans and don't want to burn off all your energy in the first 20 minutes.

LISS never really did anything for me 

Saturday, 7 July 2007 - 12:46 PM CDT

Name: skwigg

Mainly it's marathoners. Occasionally triathletes. Although I do hear from a lot of people who stall or gain doing group exercise classes or workout DVDs, even if they're the ones teaching them, or maybe especially if they're the one teaching them. Group exercise instructors can adapt to doing an obscene number of classes every week. You'd think that with the endless hours of training, they'd all be skin and bones, but the body adapts. It's helpful like that.

I think the take home lesson, even if you're not a marathoner, is not to do the same moderate cardio at the same intensity all the time because you'll adapt to it and it will become much less effective. Don't we all know somebody who's putting in hours a week watching television or reading magazines on the same cardio machine? Those people tend not to blow you away in the physique department. Usually, they're struggling.

I don't even consider the dog walk exercise. If that moderate walk were the extent of my fat burning activity, I'd be so screwed. Remember, I watch television for a living! :-) I'm sure that if all I did was walk, and count calories, and sit, I would be getting larger every year and really struggling. But because I do intense total body strength workouts, and throw up a lung on my interval training, and eat like a lumberjack, and fidget incessantly, apparently I'm still burning calories while I stare mindlessly at the TV 40-60 hours per week.

If walking or easy jogging were your only exercise... well, moving is always better than not moving. I don't think a daily walk or an occasional jog puts nearly the same whammy on your metabolism as marathon training. Sure you'd get used to it, but it's not going to eat up lean mass and throw your metabolism into conservation mode.

More from Alwyn:

Here's another one for you - ties in with the metabolic adaptation (ie it burns less calories as you get better at it), and the lack of lean mass preservation:

In a recent study (from the University of California, Berkeley) , researchers discovered that men who logged the same weekly mileage year after year—regardless of the amount—gained weight.

Case in point: even those who ran more than 40 miles a week were susceptible.

Additional research also suggests that regular running improves your body's exercise  efficiency, meaning the same amount of activity burns fewer calories.

The researchers calculated that to avoid weight gain, runners need to boost their weekly mileage by 1.7 miles every week, or approximately 88.4 miles per year, every year.

"Your metabolism slows a little more every year, so you need to increase activity levels as you age," says study author Paul T. Williams, Ph.D. "Yet most guys do the opposite."
 
 
And I think the metabolic adaptation occurs rapidly.
People can go from couch potato to marathon runner in a very short time - 6 months or less in some cases.

So they definitely adapt quickly. And in my book adaptation = burns less calories at the same intensity.

The same intensity is the key -- very few beginner marathon runners are concerned with increasing intensity or speed of training. they just want to complete the distance.
So volume and frequency tend to increase. Intensity doesn't.

--
AC

Saturday, 7 July 2007 - 2:23 PM CDT

Name: "Miss Tenacity"
Home Page: http://tenacity.net

LISS is not an acronym I use, but it sounds very similar to what I'm doing anyway - following Phil Maffetone's (and others) <a href="http://formationflier.spaces.live.com/">moderate HR training</a> in order to get faster at the same effort.

 It's not the ultra-slow fat-burning HR of 60% or so that used to be advocated, this is more like 70-75%, and is actually precisely 180-AGE.  For nearly all people that calculation is very close to ideal, but if you want to really tweak it you'd have to get your lactic threshold tested and other things.

For the record, when it comes to Maffetone training, I'm a success.  At my proper HR (about 145-148), I started out doing 10 minute miles and in 6 months that same effort and HR was getting me 8:20's.  Not too shabby.  But the "same effort" obviously means I'm burning the same or less energy than before.  So a 10 mile run might have burned 900 calories when I started and now it's 700.... who knows.

In addition to that (add insult to injury), because the lower HR training is ideally burning mostly fat, you really don't need to replenish or gorge like typical runner like to do after a long run.  Just a few hundred extra calories to top off the glycogen in the muscles and that's probably it - and most of us consume that WHILE running, in the form of gels and energy drink.  So finishing the long run and heading for the all-you-can-eat IHOP pancakes might be exactly the problem and why the fat starts creeping up.

Eating clean is the ideal, and too many runners rationalize sugary treats because of their mileage.  I can buy that once you're over 100 a week, but most are nowhere near it.  I'm only averaging 40 while marathon training, so I try to limit myself to 'real' food when I'm done, like oatmeal instead of pancakes, or milk instead of ice cream, et cetera.

Thanks to everyone for the comments and feedback, and best of luck with everything you're working towards, especially on this lucky day!  (7/7/7)

Sunday, 8 July 2007 - 7:44 AM CDT

Name: "Cynthia"

Your blog always offers the most helpful info. I'm changing my cardio ways!  I caved and ordered afterburn Thank Renee!

 

Have you seen this on the PN forum?

 http://www.bellplantation.com/

 54 calories & 3grams of fat for 2 TBSP of Peanut butter! They say it tastes great.  

Monday, 9 July 2007 - 6:49 AM CDT

Name: "Michelle"

I asked my little marathon kid at yoga about this, and she, not the boney scarecrow she was in training, said she's NOT surprised...that in the running club, SHE felt obese and like a slacker for "only" training 60 hours a week! She said the mentality for marathons is obsessive, and it goes beserk in LOTS of them and there was binge behavior gone amok...she is part of the running club still, but says she just tunes them out because the nuttiness is infectious. One guy ran 9 miles, got 2 dozen chocolate cream filled donuts, slugged em down with a frappocino and ran 9 miles home....and she said that was typical...so maybe THAT explains it...marathons are usually once or twice in a lifetime events, but some get obsessed and I  bet it goes with the same addiction part of the brain that bulimia et al goes with huh?   HER body  fat was down to 14 percent - no period, and BUFF (she did her weights and hotyoga too), now she's up to 18 percent -still looks buff, but says life is normal now!

Monday, 9 July 2007 - 8:10 AM CDT

Name: skwigg

Bingeing certainly could be an issue for some people, but I think it's wrong (really wrong) to assume that everybody who struggles with their weight during marathon training is bingeing out of control. Plenty of them are workout veterans following sound nutrtion programs and tracking everything in FitDay. In other words, they're really making a dedicated effort to eat well and get leaner, and still they maintain or start creeping up - even under that volume of trainig, and even while they're lowering their calories and carbs. THAT'S what makes the whole topic so fascinating. If all these people were wild binge eaters downing two dozen chocolate donuts after every run, there wouldn't be any mystery.

I think the same issues of adaptation and efficient fat storage come into play with the cardio bunnies/restrained eaters who do an hour a day on the same cardio machine at the same intensity. Sometimes these people are barely eating enough to keep a cricket alive, and yet even with all those hours of "aerobic" training, their body fat percentage is hopelessly stuck in the upper twenties. They write to me literally howling and pulling their hair out. Like, "What now? Am I supposed to eat LESS and exercise even MORE."

Then when they switch to heavy weights, intense interval cardio, lean protein, and six meals a day (all the classic fat burning metabolism boosters) suddenly they're able to eat human-sized portions again and they start getting leaner.

It's more complicated than just assuming that anyone who gains or struggles is a bingeing liar. ;-)

Tuesday, 10 July 2007 - 10:46 AM CDT

Name: "Kyra"
Home Page: http://shapingmyway.blogspot.com

I'm late to the party here, but this is what happened with my marathon training back in 2004.  I gained 30 lbs over an acccidentally extneded traiing period of over a year for my marathon - and then fixing the metabolism screwup has been a pain too.   I was at my leanest when doing a BFL style program and avoiding a cardio overload.  I can add strength training and other activities that rely on it (like yoga), and not have an issue, but if I add extra cardio now I have a backlash.

There is a study out there about Athelete's thyroid syndrom, and it really pretains to women, but it shows a direct affect on extra cardio and te thyroid, and how the metabolism is slowed because of it.  Of cours, it doesn't pretain to everyone. 

 I think you have to look at endurance running with a couple things in mind - fat is VERY important to runners.  It cushions the joints and stores energy.  Two things your body would want with it on a long run.  Most people are not elite - they're not running a marathon in 2 hours, they're going to hit closer to 4-6 hours.  It's sort of like having a different engine, burning in a different way. 

Tuesday, 10 July 2007 - 12:35 PM CDT

Name: "Sandi"

this was a really interesting read!  I have trained and completed 2 half marathons and 1 sprint triathlon and have to admit I looked my worst while training for the marathons.  The injuries I had to indure were rediculous as well.  I was carrying a fair amount of fat at the time and the training certainly did not make it drop off.  Part of the problem I find is that when i run, be it for a cardio workout or for training, I seem to have more difficulty controlling my urges for carb type junk food....if I ran over my lunch hour, I'd be heading to the caf for choc chip cookies in the afternoon!  My self talk was often...I just worked my ass off, so I deserve it. 

 I don't have this problem when I cycle or wt train.  After completing the marathons I took up wt training and my body comp began to respond beautifully.  I now try and use wt training as my focus and throw in some outdoor cycling and swimming for cardio variety. I'm seriously thinking of competley giving up running...I was not built to run and it is sooo hard on my body......except I may do a sprint triathlon in the fall......hopeless i know.....

Thursday, 12 July 2007 - 10:05 AM CDT

Name: "Melissa"

Skwigg -

I love reading your blog!  So much information and your a hoot to boot ( i.e.  you crack me up!).  Anyway I'm always confused about what it really takes to lose bodyfat.  I have a sedentary job (computer programmer) and I feel like I need to do cardio (moderate intensity - 60 min) every day just because I AM so sedentary all day.  Is HIIT 3x a week plus body strength weight training 3x a week really enough to lose body fat?  Also is the Afterburn program only for advanced weightlifters?  I'm advanced in knowledge but beginner/intermediate in ability because I've been a slacker lately in the workout department - LOL  Thanks for sharing your experience and knowledge!

Thursday, 12 July 2007 - 12:25 PM CDT

Name: skwigg

Challenging strength training and interval cardio are the fastest way to change your body and burn fat. 60 minutes a day of moderate cardio won't kill you (unless you die of boredom) but it's not doing anything great for your physique. You should do moderate cardio for fun, or for daily activity, not as the foundation of your fat loss plan. Check out The Hierarchy of Fat Loss article. Moderate cardio is last on the list in terms of effectiveness.

Afterburn starts slow and builds, and it starts slow enough that I have several beginners doing it no problem. Every exercise can be as brutal or as basic as you need to make it. So, a total beginner might start by doing the T push-ups agaisnt a wall or tall countertop, and someone who's advanced might do them on the floor with a dumbell in each hand and come all the way up into a weighted X push-up. Either way it rocks your world. :-) In most cases he gives a few ways to make the exercise easier or harder.

Sunday, 15 July 2007 - 10:46 AM CDT

Name: "Irene"
Home Page: http://http//magazinesmiles.blogspot.com/

Great discussion!

I've run in 3 marathons and a couple half marathons.  In my first marathon (6/05) it was a matter of experimentation and I gained about 10-15 pounds.  In my case it was eating more carbs than I actually needed and no cross training because I was thrashed when I ran any distance over 10 miles -- and it would take me several days to recoup.  It took me a couple of months to get rid of that excess weight.   In my most recent marathon, 06/03/07, I had only gained a mere 5 pounds due to carb loading the week of and after the marathon and lost the weight with in a couple of weeks.  The difference this time was that I had built up endurance for running, I didn't carb-load as heavy and I had in the past, and I did more cross training.  I wasn't thrashed after 10 miles (more like thrashed after 20 miles, now) and my recoup time is now only a day

Wednesday, 18 July 2007 - 7:54 AM CDT

Name: "IronJenny"
Home Page: http://www.ironmomjenny.blogspot.com

I just stumbled upon your site via JulieB's blog...love your site!

This discussion is TOO FUNNY - I thought I was crazy! What made me lose my marathon weight (after 20+ of them in 5 years) was biking - uses lots of large muscles while your heartrate stays low.

Then that turned me into a triathlete and now a 4x Ironman finisher. Julie B's got me interested in Ultras now as the "next thing"... so my question is, "does it ever end"? Once my metabolism and body keep "adjusting" do I need to keep changing/adding etc my workouts?

Forever????

Wednesday, 18 July 2007 - 8:25 AM CDT

Name: skwigg

I think the short answer is, yes. :-) But the biggest problem is for distance runners who only run and who do it at the same intensity every day. As long as there are still some other activities, fast intervals, big hills, or strength training in the mix, your metabolism probably won't nod off on you.

Congratulations on the Ironmans! I watch the Hawaii Ironman on TV every year and I'm always in total awe. In fact, who am I to give you fitness advice? LOL You carry on, and I'll go sit quietly and watch cartoons and eat some grapes off my Spiderman plate. :-)

Once my metabolism and body keep "adjusting" do I need to keep changing/adding etc my workouts?

Forever????

View Latest Entries