« December 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Skwigg Blog
Sunday, 31 December 2006
Eat More / Eat Less Question

Q: My weight loss has stalled and the "helpful" advice I'm getting is pretty equally divided between people telling me to eat less in order to start losing again and people telling me to eat more because I'm in starvation mode. So which is it? And how could eating more possibly cause me to lose weight?

A: The "eat more / eat less" thing seems contradictory at first glance, but either way your weight loss stalls because you're NOT creating a calorie deficit. In one case it's because you're eating too many calories, and in the other case it's because you're not burning enough - as in, your metabolism has rolled over and died.

Either way, you have to get the deficit happening again in order to burn body fat. You can make your metabolism faster with more fuel and more activity, or you can make your calorie intake smaller with less food, but you have to widen and maintain the deficit in order to see changes.

The more weight you have to lose and the higher your calorie intake, the more likely you're still consuming too many calories. The leaner and more athletic you are, and the harder you train, the more likely you've cut your calories too low for your activity level and put the brakes on your metabolism. It's a mind-bender for sure, but if the goal is fat loss, "focus on the deficit" is the correct advice in either situation.

People have been duped into thinking that eating less and exercising more is the only way to create a calorie deficit, but the other option is to ramp up your metabolism. If you have a fast metabolism, your body burns more calories both at rest and during training, and that metabolic boost is what makes the deficit bigger. It doesn't necessarily involve increasing your activity or reducing your calories, it involves convincing your body to burn more.

There are plenty of people training 2 hours a day and living on lettuce whose body only burns 1000 calories per day. They can either cut their calories to 800 and add a couple more hours of exercise, or they can ease up on the calorie restriction and allow their metabolism to recover to the point that it's burning the 1,500, 1,900 or 2,400 calories that it should have been burning in the first place. Once your metabolism is back in action, you're able to start losing again at a higher calorie level than where you were previously stalled.

Metabolism Killers:
- diets that are consistently low in calories without any cheats, refeeds, or high days
- diets that are low in protein and fat and high in processed carbs
- going hungry most of the day and eating a 1-2 big meals
- hours of moderate aerobic exercise followed by hours of sitting at a desk or in front of a television
- light weights and high-reps, you know, for toning...

Metabolism Boosters:
- diets that zig-zag calories so that some days there's actually a surplus
- diets that are high in lean protein, healthy fat, and fresh fruits and vegetables
- eating every 2-3 hours for a total of 6-8 small protein and carb balanced meals per day
- brief very intense cardio intervals combined with a high general daily activity level
- heavy total body strength workouts

Posted by skwigg at 12:18 PM CST

Sunday, 31 December 2006 - 2:25 PM CST

Name: "Lana"

Skwigg, 

One thing I've never understood is how long it takes to boost your metabolism back up. How will you know when your body is running at full steam again--how will you know when to cut back the calories slightly to achieve fat loss?  

Sunday, 31 December 2006 - 2:47 PM CST

Name: skwigg

"Lana" wrote:

Skwigg, 

One thing I've never understood is how long it takes to boost your metabolism back up. How will you know when your body is running at full steam again--how will you know when to cut back the calories slightly to achieve fat loss?  


How long it takes to fix a slow metabolism depends on how long you were severely undereating. It might take a week or two - or months. The idea is to bring your calories up gradually, adding 50-100 calories to your daily intake each week while following a metabolism-boosting program (protein, weights, interval training, frequent meals). It's normal for your weight to creep up a few pounds initially, but the idea is to minimize or eliminate that gain by continuing to eat well and train hard. You'll know you've "arrived" when your weight stabilizes at the new higher calorie intake. Then you can start dropping them again. So maybe somebody weighs 130 pounds but has a high percentage of body fat and is struggling to maintain on only 1200 calories a day. After a 4-6 weeks of slowly increasing calories, maybe they gain 5 pounds (some of it muscle) but their weight is now totally stable at 1800 calories a day. And if they drop the calories back to 1500-1600 they'll start losing again. So now they're losing in a higher calorie range than what they used to have to eat to maintain.

Monday, 1 January 2007 - 6:46 PM CST

Name: "Kristi"
Home Page: http://www.thecrucialera.blogspot.com

Skwigg,

 This post really worries me. How can those of us who have a desk job boost our metabolism when we can't keep our activity level up?

 Kristi

Tuesday, 2 January 2007 - 12:01 AM CST

Name: "Skwigg"

"Kristi" wrote:

Skwigg,

 This post really worries me. How can those of us who have a desk job boost our metabolism when we can't keep our activity level up?

 Kristi


Um, well, you're talking to somebody who watches TV for a living. I'm on my ass in front of a television at least 60 hour a week. And when I'm not sitting in front of a television, I tend to be sitting in front of a computer. (Damned internet addiction...) So, it's mainly a matter of doing all the other things right - challenging weights, interval cardio, frequent meals, etc.. AND, this is a biggie. It pays to be fidgety. Even though I sit for a living, I'm rarely ever holding still. I'm talking incessently, tapping a foot, spinning in my chair, pacing back and forth on the phone, parking a block away, running two flights of stairs to use the restroom. I waste energy all over the place. It's called non-exercise activity thermogenisis. For more info on how that works, see That's NEAT.

Saturday, 6 January 2007 - 10:46 AM CST

Name: "Marsha"

I'm a long-time reader, but I don't know that I've commented before.  I just wanted to thank you for this post about eating more, at least occasionally.

I've been on Weight Watchers for a couple of months and have been very compliant about eating within my points allowance.  Then a couple of days ago, I had a wretched day where I ate anything that wasn't nailed down.  The next day I was really beating myself up for that disaster.

While I don't "plan" on that kind of feast again, your post makes me thing that overfeeding day might not have been as destructive as I was thinking.  Thanks for that -- and for a consistently great blog!

(Also, take care with your cold!)

View Latest Entries